Businesses around the world have moved from self-hosted infrastructure to public cloud configurations. While most businesses will always need on-premise technology, they are developing their applications directly in the cloud. This allows development teams to focus on the product, rather than having to work on the infrastructure to support the application. By moving to the cloud, companies have an existing physical infrastructure that is continuously maintained and updated. This gives them more resources and time to devote to the mobile app development project at hand.
Currently, there are three major cloud platform providers that occupy most of the market share. They are Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform (GCP). While Azure and GCP are growing steadily, AWS remains the clear leader in market share. Each platform has its own features and pricing which may match the development requirements of your mobile applications. Read on how each platform compares to each other. Ice providers offer high-quality services, with high reliability, high security, good performance, and with good customer support. So the market is dominated by the three main providers: Amazon Web Services, Heroku, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure.
Each CSP provides a number of products that cover everything you may need for your online operations. The three providers differ, not only in pricing but also in the way each provider group their services. Below, I show you the most common elements: infrastructure, auto-scaling, security, monitoring, and much more. The goal is to help you identify by crossing the different services provided by each CSP so that you can easily identify the ideal services for your business.
Amazon Web Services
The Amazon cloud platform offers nearly all the capabilities of the cloud computing industry. Their cloud services provide easy access to the processing power, data storage, or other functionality needed by app developers. AWS has many products that fall into many categories. In addition to the features mentioned above, they offer development tools, management tools, mobile services, and application services. As you can imagine, application services combined with IT and database infrastructure are critical components for a successful enterprise mobile app development team.
In addition to a wide range of services, the AWS cloud has been adopting cloud computing pricing since its inception in 2006. Their pricing is very competitive with all other cloud providers. Prices for their cloud services have continued to decline due to competition and pricing structures. AWS offers free service levels for startups and individuals. It is an easy way to try before your purchase. Additionally, development teams can purchase servers by the second rather than by the hour. Depending on the services your team uses, you can definitely find a reasonable AWS pricing structure that is lower than the cost of all the infrastructure investment.
Similar to AWS cloud services, Azure offers a full range of solutions for the needs of app developers. The platform gives you the ability to deploy and manage virtual machines at scale. You can process and calculate at any capacity you need in minutes. Plus, if your custom software needs to do large-scale parallel batch processing, it can handle it too. This is actually a unique feature of AWS and Azure via Google’s cloud platform. Comprehensive Azure capabilities integrate into existing systems and processes, delivering more power and capacity for business development.
When considering Azure pricing, you need to keep in mind that costs will depend on the types of products required by the development team. The hourly cost of the server can range from $ 0.099 per hour to $ 0.149 per hour. Of course, if you measure costs by instance only, the prices may not seem consistent. However, the prices are quite comparable to AWS when you factor in the price per GB of RAM. As leading enterprise cloud service providers compete for your business, pricing remains competitive across the board.
Google Cloud Platform
Once again, Google Cloud Platform has a plethora of developer services. As an enterprise mobile app development team, you may be interested in the App Engine product. This allows an app developer to build applications without taking care of the server. It is a fully managed solution for agile application development. Plus, you can perform high-level calculations, storage, networking, and databases with GCP. These are all great products to use depending on the type of app development you’re working on. Although Google has some cheaper services than the competition, you can find all the requirements for mobile application development projects.
Where GCP can lag behind in additional features, it makes up for cost efficiency. The platform also has to pay by price, billing the “per second” of use. By separating GCP, it offers discounts for long-term use starting after the first month. This is great if you are starting a new mobile app development project and want to keep costs down. Conversely, it may take more than a year to get long-term discounts on other cloud service providers. Clearly, Google is putting pressure on competing cloud providers to keep market prices lower.
Amazon with its EC2 proposal (Elastic Cloud Compute) allows you to select the computational capacity, the memory, the number of cloud servers, and the operating system, choosing from a whole series of ready-to-use AMI images. Amazon also provides the ELB service of load-balancing between the different VMs and allows the self-scaling of computational capacity and DNS failover.
Google is not that far from the same type of offering, but unlike Amazon, Mountain View’s computing proposals were released starting in 2013. In the same year, in May, Microsoft’s cloud computing proposal arrived. , first with the name of Windows Azure and then simply renamed Azure. Amazon AMIs are the VHDs that represent the images with which to create the different cloud servers.
AWS offers a temporary storage service that is allocated when an instance is launched and can be attached to the instance itself or kept apart. The object storage service takes the form of the well-known S3 proposal, while long-term archiving takes place with Glacier.
Google offers both persistent and temporary cloud storage through the Cloud Storage service, while Glacier’s antagonist for long-term archiving, called Nearline, has been launched in beta these days.
Azure, for its part, offers temporary D drive storage and Page Blobs block storage, while object storage is provided through the Block Blobs and Files serve services.
Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) and Azure Virtual Network (VNET) both allow you to manage isolated networks in the cloud, choosing the network topology, the presence of subnets, and much more. Google also offers more or less the same services, so in the networking field, it can be said that the real difference between the three big providers is the DNS Route 53 service offered exclusively by Amazon AWS.